Announced

The Best and Worst Identities of 2014, Part 2: The Worst Reviewed

announcement

Announced December 24, 201412.24.14 by Armin

filed under Announcement and tagged with

This is a first. I could only select six projects that fit the description of “Worst”. Last year I remember having a hard time finding 12 but I still managed. This year, at least in the Reviewed category, there were barely any projects that really made me cringe. There was a lot of boring or middle of the road work but projects deserving of being labeled as the worst representations of identity design were few. There weren’t any blunders from large companies and there weren’t any communally-hated projects. Which might be good news, there is less work that sucks! Still, here are the clunkers for this year.

Also:
Part 1: The Best Reviewed
Part 3: The Best Noted
Part 4: The Worst Noted
Part 5: Most Liked Friday Likes

In my original review I didn’t commit to not liking this project but now, in retrospect, I very much do. That “a” is just inexcusable and the rest of the wordmark isn’t helping.

Poll Results (Total Votes Cast)

Great

Fine

Bad

On Logo

14.4%

32.7%

52.8%

On Ads

7.4%

33.3%

59.3%

The problem here isn’t so much the new design — although it doesn’t do much — but the “strategy” to have two logos for the National Park Service at the same time is far from smart.

Poll Results (Total Votes Cast)

Great

Fine

Bad

On Foundation Evolution

12%

31.6%

56.3%

On New Logos

10.8%

30.5%

58.7%

On Double-Launch

5.6%

13.1%

81.2%

The arrow icon is passable and there were some decent applications but the wordmark, with those wimpy “r”s and tittle-less “i”, deserves to get lost in the mail.

Poll Results (Total Votes Cast)

Great

Fine

Bad

On Icon

28.1%

48.6%

23.4%

On Wordmark

16.3%

45.9%

37.8%

On Ads

34.5%

46.2%

19.2%

In all fairness this could have been much worse and the polls showed some remarkable mercy placing it more in the Fine than Bad range but, still, this could have also been much better with a slightly more grown-up vibe and less clip-arty branches.

Poll Results (Total Votes Cast)

Great

Fine

Bad

On Typography

18.1%

39.5%

42.5%

On Olive Branches

17.7%

48.3%

34.0%

An organization with such a storied global presence desrved better than this triangle overdose and uncomfortable wordmark.

Poll Results (Total Votes Cast)

Great

Fine

Bad

On Logo

3.8%

18.8%

77.4%

On Application

7.6%

43.3%

49.1%

With only three simple letters to not screw up, FCA managed to get all three wrong with a too-wide “F”, a nearly-“O”-ish “C”, and a bland “A”. To boot, it’s completely unbalanced horizontally.

Poll Results (Total Votes Cast)

Great

Fine

Bad

On Execution

1%

8.8%

90.1%

↓Comments

Upcoming BNConfs

Chicago 2017
Pre-sale tickets are now available for the 2017 Brand New Conference in Chicago on September 14 – 15.

Europe 2018
Plans are in development for coming back to Europe in Spring of 2018 with the current top contender host city of Barcelona.

---