Opinions on corporate and brand identity work.

A division of UnderConsideration.








Share ›

New Logo and Identity for DDB done In-house and with Ian Brignell
 

before

after

Noted Mar. 26, 2019 by Armin

Industry / Corporate Tags /

About

(Est. 1949) “DDB Worldwide Communications Group Inc., known internationally as DDB, is a worldwide marketing communications network. It is owned by Omnicom Group Inc, one of the world’s largest advertising holding companies (revenues US$12.69B according to Advertising Age in April 2008). The international advertising networks Doyle Dane Bernbach and Needham Harper merged their worldwide agency operations to become DDB Needham in 1986. At that same time the owners of Doyle Dane Bernbach, Needham Harper and BBDO merged their shareholdings to form the worldwide holding company Omnicom. In 1996, DDB Needham became known as DDB Worldwide.” (Wikipedia)

Design by

In-house: DDB North America
Ian Brignell (Toronto, Canada)

Related links

Campaign Live story

Images (opinion after)
New Logo and Identity for DDB done In-house and with Ian Brignell
Original DDB logo.
New Logo and Identity for DDB done In-house and with Ian Brignell
Logo.
New Logo and Identity for DDB done In-house and with Ian Brignell
Underlying grid. Sigh.
New Logo and Identity for DDB done In-house and with Ian Brignell
Wordmark.
New Logo and Identity for DDB done In-house and with Ian Brignell
Logo as window.
New Logo and Identity for DDB done In-house and with Ian Brignell
Business cards.
New identity presentation.
Opinion

The old logo was fine… bland but fine. The degree mark has always made me confuse DDB with BBDO, another worldwide ad agency, because it’s so prominent and almost reads like an “O”. The new logo uses the agency’s original logo as a basis, with two “D”s stacked to make a “B”. I don’t think the original logo was that great but it was a little clearer that it was two “D”s, whereas the new one it’s really hard to read the two shapes as “D”s — I mean, it’s not hard-hard, it’s just not obvious because the “B” shape is so pronounced. Concept aside, it’s an okay logo… kind of clunky and too tall but it’s fine. The logo-as-window stuff is as unoriginal as it gets and makes the identity look very dated. The wordmark part is fine too… it has an FF Meta-esque vibe but with a wider structure that’s kind of interesting. The one straight-up application — the business cards — does look decent and the tall-ness of the logo plays well there but that’s about the nicest thing I have to say. The motion stuff in the video is a little lame and, again, feels dated somehow… like 1990s ideas with 2019 technology. Overall, my expectations of how identity plays out in the advertising world are met — which is to say, they are not high.

Thanks to Jothish John for the tip.

Your opinion…

On Logo


Total

On Application


Total

Comments


Logo Before & After
Sample Application

Share ›

Spotted Around the web

New Logo for Hillrom

New Logo for Hillrom
 
Spotted Jul. 18, 2019

New Name and Logo for Acoustic

New Name and Logo for Acoustic
Spotted Jul. 18, 2019

Pinned Recent, Big Stories


Curated Dot dot dot